WTA Players Who Look Like Australian Open Contenders on the Odds Board-But Are Unlikely to Win

Australian Open contenders

The futures market is filled with Australian Open contenders unlikely to win, creating the illusion of depth in a tournament that has historically rewarded only a small, surface-specific elite.

The early odds for the 2026 Women’s Australian Open suggest a wide-open race, with a dozen names priced as if they belong in the title conversation. 

History and the data tell a very different story. 

The Australian Open has never rewarded reputation, win percentage, or brand value; it rewards surface-specific dominance, durability, and the ability to survive seven high-pressure matches on the fastest hard court in Grand Slam tennis. 

This isn’t a piece about who can win the Australian Open. It’s about why most WTA Tour players priced as contenders won’t, and how the betting market keeps getting that distinction wrong.


📊 2026 Women’s Australian Open — Outright Odds (American)

Several WTA players listed among Australian Open contenders unlikely to win are priced on reputation rather than Melbourne-specific results.

Check out what I mean on our 2026 Women’s Australian Open championship odds table below.

Player FanDuel DraftKings Caesars Pinnacle bet365
Aryna Sabalenka +200 +200 +195 +202 +200
Iga Świątek +440 +450 +460 +470 +400
Coco Gauff +750 +800 +780 +790 +700
Elena Rybakina +750 +850 +820 +830 +700
Mirra Andreeva +950 +900 +920 +960 +1200
Madison Keys +1200 +1200 +1150 +1250 +2000
Naomi Osaka +1600 +1700 +1650 +1680 +1400
Qinwen Zheng +2500 +2600 +2550 +2600 +2000
Karolina Muchova +3000 +3000 +2800 +3050 +2500
Jessica Pegula +3300 +3500 +3400 +3600 +3300
Emma Navarro +3300 +3800 +3650 +3800 +8000
Paula Badosa +4000 +4200 +4000 +4200 +10000
Jasmine Paolini +4000 +4500 +4300 +4500 +4000
Diana Shnaider +4000 +4500 +4300 +4600 +6600
Elina Svitolina +5000 +5200 +5000 +5200 +5000

📝 Editor’s Note

Earlier this offseason, we published a forecast titled Which Women Can Actually Win the 2026 Australian Open” identifying a handful of players with statistical profiles and recent form that have historically aligned with deep Slam runs. That piece remains a useful baseline for contenders and probabilities as the market develops.

This current analysis serves a different, but complementary purpose: to highlight where the futures betting market has priced players as realistic title threats — despite data and surface-specific performance suggesting their odds are inflated.

In other words, one piece focuses on who has the plausible path to win; this piece focuses on who is being priced as if they do. Many names appear in both discussions, but the lens and meaning of their placement is distinct.

As always, markets and player situations evolve, and we’ll continue updating both angles through the lead-up to Melbourne.


Iga Świątek — +400

Iga Świątek remains elite overall, but the Australian Open has consistently been her weakest Slam in terms of the odds on the board.

She owns a strong 25–7 career record in Melbourne, yet that success hasn’t translated into an Australian Open championship, or even a final.

Her serve sits up on faster hard courts, and her Australian Open runs have routinely ended before the final weekend, far more often than +400 implies.

She’s a two-time semifinalist (2022, 2025), but in both runs she was ultimately overpowered by elite, big-hitting opposition, particularly aggressive American attackers who exposed her serve and shortened points.

At this number, you’re paying for ranking and résumé, and not proven Australian Open supremacy.


Karolina Muchova — +2500

Karolina Muchova’s all-court game looks beautiful on paper, but the Australian Open is a seven-match physical test in brutal heat, and one she has rarely survived unscathed.

Outside of a 2021 semifinal run, her Melbourne résumé is thin, with multiple early exits defining the rest of her career there.

The pattern holds elsewhere. She went 25–14 on hard courts in 2025 without reaching a single final, underscoring how often her level dips across longer stretches.

Australian Open futures markets continue to price her at her best, not the one that’s usually on a plane home before the second week begins.


Jessica Pegula — +3300

Jessica Pegula thrives on consistency, but Australian Open champions typically overpower fields, and she has repeatedly struggled to pull the trigger in the biggest moments.

Her Melbourne résumé is respectable — a 16–8 career record with three quarterfinal appearances (2021–2023) — yet those runs have ended without a single signature win over elite, big-hitting opposition late in the tournament.

The broader Slam picture reinforces the point. Pegula has reached one Grand Slam final (2024 US Open) across 39 major appearances, a conversion rate that underscores the gap between reliability and true championship upside.

At +3300, the price reflects steadiness and ranking security, just not a realistic Australian Open title path.


Emma Raducanu — +5000

Emma Raducanu’s market presence still far exceeds her Slam-level consistency.

She hasn’t shown the fitness required to navigate a full Australian Open draw, and her Melbourne résumé is blunt: never past the third round in four tries.

She hasn’t reached a final in any event since winning the 2021 US Open, owns an 8–23 career mark vs the Top 20, and is 5–16 vs the Top 20 on hard courts.

At +5000, the odds still price in another US Open miracle, but that reality hasn’t arrived across multiple hard-court Slams.


Emma Navarro — +3300

Emma Navarro’s rise has been real, but Australian Open champions typically arrive with proven week-two Slam reps and elite finishing power.

Melbourne has offered only a glimpse of that ceiling so far. Her hard-court game is solid and efficient, yet it lacks the point-shortening gear that consistently separates true contenders from quarterfinal ceilings in Australia.

She owns a 6–2 career Australian Open record, with her best finish a quarterfinal run in 2025, and she’s been pushed to three sets in seven of eight AO matches, a sign of competitiveness, but also of thin margins.

Even with a 19–15 hard-court record and a Merida title, the market is pricing momentum and ranking progression, not a demonstrated ability to be one of the primary Australian Open contenders.

At +3300, you’re paying for trajectory, and not a realistic Australian Open title path.

📚 Further Reading

For broader context on the futures market — and the data that separates real title paths from inflated prices — explore our Australian Open and WTA hubs below:

Have Your Say